YNOT article states:"Although there is little the U.S. or any other government could do to ?kill? dot-xxx at this point ? at least without being accused of an agenda that includes an out-of-control censorship agenda and a healthy dose of authoritarian arrogance ? all stakeholders want to make sure the same sort of controversy doesn?t erupt again"
Are u jokin me?
1) In the past decade the US govt always stopped .XXX . Aside from Lawley nobody complained. NOBODY.
2) By granting .XXX to only one company that would oversee all cum drenched faces, would be the biggest censorship ever in the history of the US. Silencing millions of people for just one fat pig.
3) ICANN maybe saying at meeting, " yeah, we fucked up, were sorry Gac, and will use .XXX as example so not do it again."
Wrong! Gac needs to start with .XXX. Block that shit. Because ICANN's going to try to hustle, on keeping .XXX but saying no to .sex, .pussy, .porn so ICM has the total monopoly on piss and bukkake's.
|