Quote:
Originally Posted by VGeorgie
You're the moron. Look up 17 U.S.C. §102(a)(8) and §102(a)(5).
If you still think otherwise, CITE THE APPLICABLE LAW. Stop spouting your usual unsubstantiated shit. Or worse, your "proof" in the form of someone else's unsubstantiated blog article.
Carmakers routinely file for design patents, which are tangible IP, despite your statements otherwise. Certain designs may be further associated with a trademark (e.g. the Coke bottle), which do not expire unless the holder abandons the mark.
Many car replica makers have been sued to their last dime, thinking the same as you. Wanna try it?
Particularly distinctive buildings are almost always protected by a design patent, in addition to the copyrights afforded since the law was changed in 1990.
|
really want to show me one of those cases where they won damges based on COPYRIGHT law
or are you too stupid to understand this kind of stupid misrepresentation is exactly what i am talking about when i said
Quote:
again moron you need to look up the difference between patent and copyright law
|