Quote:
Originally Posted by MisterPeabody
Two quick points here, one for Paul and one for Nathan:
Paul is correct in his seed money calculations IF someone were to just shoot a solo girl, etc. (And I also agree most solo girls aren't worth trying a site for and those that are will probably make some nice extra income instead of "getting rich".) BUT if it's a "Ma and Pa"-type operation, or the solo girl has a lot of content she's gathered over the years, OR if she's willing to shoot content for her own site for free, then the costs are way lower. Profits still may suck tho. LOL
Nathan: THE ONLY WAY on Planet Earth to get 65 members a day, every damn day, after only a month in operation is either (and probably a combination of) MASS traffic, MASS affiliates and MASS money being invested. The average solo girl site would be ecstatic with 5 sales a day, every day, after a month of operation. 
Just some perspective from my "World". LOL |
I was actually thinking of a solo girl site with lots of different girls. I've rarely seen a girl good enough to carry a solo girl site. Good looking enough, personality right and bags of sexuality. Then you're up against what this girl could earn by not going exclusive. $50,000 a year is possible, well it was before the market was shredded.
Even today she might not want to do it for $25,000 a year. It's only $500 a week. Maybe in the Mid West, but good luck finding a top girl for $500 a week.
Then the site owner puts his future into the hands of an 18-25 year old whose silly enough to go naked in front of a camera.
Unless the site owner has a pot full of money to shoot so much of her, before she changes her mind.