Quote:
Originally Posted by MisterPeabody
Paul and Nathan: perhaps the definition of a solo GIRL site has changed? LOL Maybe a SoCal- or Twistys-type site should be called a solo GIRLS site? When I hear "solo girl" i think of a site devoted to, well, a solo girl. What you both described are, to me, "multi-girl" sites, a totally differant animal.
|
Multi-girl to me is is lesbian with more than three girls. But I based my figures on a site paying the model.
Running a site with a model as a partner, is IMO a recipe for a disaster. You're putting your business into the hands of a girl you have no control over. If she's your wife, even then she can just turn around and say,
"I'm finished with modeling. If she's not your wife the odds on keeping her loyal are slim.
Basing a site on many solo models is IMO a much better prospect, you're not tied to one girls, you can go from girl to girl, the site has lots of different personalities, looks and ways of turning on the members. Plus there are ways to develop good girls within the site. Something Mofos and Brazzers are clueless at.
******************
After 10 years of listening to the twaddle written on boards and the state of the industry it's amazing how little people have learned.
It's so clearly not about traffic, niche and markets or even free and piracy. It's about the product. The customer is clearly rejecting the product, for a variety of reasons, not good enough is the main one. Price and length of membership follow behind that and then trust.
If you need 1,000 people to look at free content to get a sign up, there's something very very wrong. Everything in porn is niche, teens to girls in custard. Now micro niche is the claimed money maker. Because the major niches are selling????
Marketing is what? If online porn had a clue what marketing was it would have gone from ratios of 1-50 to 1-5,000, depending on traffic and sites. Marketing is about improving sales, not throwing more people at a product that sell s less and less.
Free. If free is competing with paid. Then the paid for product isn't good enough. The actual idea that you have to keep giving away more and more free content to get a sign up is about as stupid an idea as ever.
$30 for 30 days recurring is to pay for traffic. That's it. Most of the customer no longer has to buy and rejects that option.
But no doubt I will be called wrong, while the industry continues going down.
