Quote:
Originally Posted by Paul Markham
What happens? You have a reason to DMCA them.
If you have the same content that 100 others produce, then it's pointless sending a DMCA.
Look at the companies dragging Tubes into court. How many online only ones in that mix?
The stupidity of the people who were in online porn is. They could of had great content for free. In fact it would of produced a profit without online.
Great content few if any could duplicate.
Content that would turn surfers into customers fast and keep them as customers for a lot longer.
Less hassle than what online was doing.
And it's all FREE!! 
Tubes is killing the business for most. Like TGPs killed it for some offline porn and made online porn harder to sell. And don't tell me they didn't. Give me logical argument. So I can swipe it down with more logic. |
The only "logic" here in 2011 is that if you shoot a hot amateur scene with a girl who embodies sexuality and fucks with wild abandon...more folks are gonna enjoy that than a big budget "Pirates" type "movie".
And the minute it is released it will be STOLEN and put on a thousand different sites. Good luck trying to DMCA all of that down...and oh by the way...after you send the DMCA it can be 2 weeks or more before some of them will get around to taking it down.
And then when it FINALLY comes down and your expensive scene has already been seen and downloaded for free by millions of ex-potential customers...it will just get uploaded again a few minutes later and you get to start all over again.
That is the unfortunate reality we live with today as producers of content. Until new copyright laws are passed that are up to date with the internet...it's just not gonna do you much good to create the content you speak of, UNLESS you can protect your members area (which can be done and is being done)