Quote:
Originally Posted by Dirty Dane
No you moron, user only posted ONE video and was banned for something else.
|
really
Quote:
|
sus89 has been terminated due to repeated or severe violations of our Community Guidelines and/or claims of copyright infringement.
|
you made that same bullshit arguement the last time i proved this fact
like i said before
Quote:
no i am saying you have no clue, the video example i just showed you proves that youtube does not delete all the videos from an account when they bann an account
the video is still up
the account is gone, that would never happen if all the videos are deleted when the account is banned.
you are talking out of your ass
|
https://gfy.com/showpost.php?p=17642428&postcount=184
Quote:
It was not designed to prevent censorship, but to prevent liability.
Once again you show lack of basic knowledge of DMCA and its purpose. It's written in DMCA that they must not know about the infringements and they must act upon on the obvious or suspection. You may call acting on criminal activities "censorship" as much you like, but in the real world that logic doesn't apply or give you less liability.
|
idiot do you understand the difference between a purpose and a practise
they didn't just decide to give hosts a blanket immunity for no reason
they decided to give a host a blanket immunity to prevent censorship
to avoid having the new takedown being abused to censor legitimate free speech (thru fair use)
go back and read the discussion about th law when it was being debated.