Quote:
Originally Posted by kane
Correct. The way I understand it, they read the three strikes law, didn't agree with and didn't want it to be in existence. But the way it sounds to me you have to commit this crime three different times before you lose your access.
You are always saying that you are against copyright violation and you don't commit copyright violation so what is the big deal? If a person has a legitimate and legal reason to be downloading something they have nothing to worry about. Only those who break the law consistently need worry.
|
because the three strikes law doesn't require a full trial with full access to free public defenders so you can defend yourself when the copyright holder misrepresents fair use as an infringement
the 3 strike law doesn't have a balancing penalty when the copyright holder misrepresents fair use as a copyright infringement.
if a false complaint (3 strikes and you lose the right to every register another copyright again) was in place i would have no problem with the law.
a one side law which has no penalty for bad accusations means a lot of innocent people are going to get caught in the drag net.