Originally Posted by gideongallery

so we are going back to your bullshit copyright is not a monpoly even the supreme court declared it as one, becausse i say so bullshit again.

you were not right then and you are not right now

UN treaty defines what is and is not a basic human right

the UN treaty says it a free speech, the right to voice your oppinion

BTW you don't have to drive your car to have the free speech your talking about
that free speech works just as well if you push your car around the block.

that a huge difference between that and taking away an entire medium of communication.




seriously are you actually so stupid as to equate limiting access conditiionally to a complete outright ban

kiddie porn is a limiting condition, are you going to make the arguement that we should out right ban all porn because under limited conditions (kids being filmed it restricted)

here is the difference the "rights" your talking about are not universally recognized by every country in the UN as basic human rights, free speech is.






i am making a point about the double standard your having

if you truely believe that absolute rights can be taken away because conditiional rights can be taken away

you should believe that copyriight holder rights should also be allowed too be taken away

as you pointed out



so only the copyright holders who REPEATEDLY abuse the reporting process will lose their copyright.