Quote:
Originally Posted by harvey
1) I made no comment on the article 19 because I knew you would step in, that's how predictable you are. After all, I was expecting you would say the exact word-for-word motto of all the pirates.... and you didn't fail at it. But of course, "you're against piracy"  |
your not talking about just stopping piracy your talking about stopping all the communication of the person because of 3 accusations of piracy
if you stopped the 3 piracy and left the other communications alone, i would have no problem with what your were doing
your talking about preventing the person from every posting a blog, ever responding to a post
That the free speech i am talking about you preventing
and you ignored the one rule that clearly proves those preventions are a violation
well duh of course i was going to mention that rule
i would be a world class moron if i didn't.
Quote:
|
And your RedHat example is laughable (like everything you said in this thread). So you mean that if I work for free I'll be rich? Or do you mean that YOU and OTHER PIRATES will dictate how should I work and earn my living so you can profit on my effort? Please elaborate, this is getting really funny
|
nope never said that either
re read it again
Quote:
and before you twist that statement to say i am anti copyright
just because it not a human right doesn't make it not a right at all
human rights should supercede other rights, sue them ,take their house, but don't totally blacklist them from a medium of communication.
|
i will say it again for you (slightly differently)
none of the human rights are violated by piracy. PERIOD
that doesn't means that your right were not violated
that doesn't mean that your rights should be allowed to be violated
it does mean you don't have a right to violate human rights in response
do anything else, just don't violate the human rights (right #19 in this case).
Quote:
3) Copyright BY DEFINITION isn't monopoly. BY DEFINITION.
When there are MILLIONS of people holding copyright for their creations, speaking of monopoly crosses the line beyond retardness to enter a whole new universe of stupidity and non-sense.
|
it not my definition it the supreme court of the united states definition
your doing the same thing that kane has repeatedly done
trying to argue that the legal definition of the highest court in the land is wrong BECAUSE YOU SAY SO.
read the transcript of the betamax case, copyright was DEFINED AS A MONOPOLY MULTIPE TIMES.
Quote:
But even then, I have the option to use different rights attributions (GPL, copyleft, etc). IF I CHOOSE TO DO SO. NOT BECAUSE A CRIMINAL DICTATED THAT I'M OBLIGATED TO DO IT. This is the FREEDOM OF CHOICE, not your proposed economic slavery
4) One thing is defending FREEDOM OF SPEECH. What you're defending is PIRACY. I don't know of ANY site that was seized because of opinions, not even wiki leaks. The only sites you're crying for are the ones pirating content. 100% of them. So, please explain me oh freedom fighter how this is not defending piracy and thieves.
5) Sorry if I don't accept that you and people like you controls my life and my family's for your own profit. I live in a country where slavery doesn't exist since 1813. Period.
|
seriously what about the statement
Quote:
and before you twist that statement to say i am anti copyright
just because it not a human right doesn't make it not a right at all
human rights should supercede other rights, sue them ,take their house, but don't totally blacklist them from a medium of communication.
|
i am not forcing you to do anything
i am simply saying that your attempt to claim that copyrights are basic human right is bullshit
not that they are no rights at all