Quote:
Originally Posted by gideongallery
30. No one has the right to take away any of the rights in this declaration
the 30th rule says you have no right to take away any of the rights
Again i ask you the question before
how exactly are you going to respond to my post if your internet is cut off
your arguing for a clear form of censorship
what if the religious right said you can only sell porn in this little block in one spot in the city
no selling anything online at all
by your definition that not violating your free speech rights at all since your still have the ability to express your self in that very limited way.
guess what that would violate 30th rule.
|
OK, I understand you're getting your ass hurt. And badly. Hence why you're either a)playing dumb, OR b) in fact you're a complete retard.
So let me answer your question, which was already answered above oh you freedom fighter:
Quote:
the 30th rule says you have no right to take away any of the rights
Again i ask you the question before
how exactly are you going to respond to my post if your internet is cut off
|
I CAN MOVE WITH MY LAPTOP TO ANOTHER WI FI SPOT. OR GET ANOTHER ISP SERVICE. OR GO TO AN INTERNET CAFE.
do you get it now?
Now explain me why fighting piracy still guarantees freedom of speech to any reasonable degree, yet you defend taking away MANY of the rights in the Declaration of Human Rights. Bah, don't bother, as we have saw in this thread you're a fucking retard.
And "oh the monopoly of copyright" (funny how you avoided it when I shown your unlimited display of nonsense): since when information is copyrighted? What you're talking about when you cry about those mean copyright holders is PIRACY. But you're so full of bullshit that you don't even have the balls to stand fro what you believe and take turns and leaps.
Finally, I've never, EVER said anything about you and your support of piracy (yeah, sorry I didn't buy your "fair use" song, I'm a grown up). But Human Rights were, are and will always be used by politicians and criminals around the world to justify acts based on the extremely free interpretation of a fair justice spirit. It hurts Human Rights as a whole, and the people working on (or for) Human Rights organizations around the world. Like... ME. Hence, I take offense in every single lie you said in this thread. Watch your mouth before tainting the fight and struggle of hundreds of thousands of men and women for a better world that NEVER, EVER will consider slavery, poverty, domination or crime as goals. All those beautiful things you're defending and couldn't deny because you already shown you have 0 (ZERO, NADA) arguments.
Or at least have the balls to stand up for what you REALLY believe. But like all thieves, you're a fucking chicken