Quote:
Originally Posted by gideongallery
wow so your dodging my question again
answer mine and i will answer yours
if the government outlawed online sales of porn
requiring that you only sell porn in face to face transactions to absolutely prevent children from gaining access to porn (even stealing daddy credit card won't get you access)
let say they required you to take pictures of every person buying porn and post it in a registry so they could absolutely confirm that it wasn't a child with all their drivers licience and id info publically available
would you support those restrictions.
btw what exaxtly do you mean by it, are you saying it is the internet as a whole, or are your saying it is the copyright material they are pirating
my answer is different depending on what you mean by it in your question.
|
If the united states government banned the online sale of porn and forced it back to the brick and mortar days, while I would not be happy about it, I would accept it. Why? Because selling porn is not a basic human right. There are a lot of ways I can make a living so I would either move to a different country where I could keep selling porn online or do something else.
So there you have it. It would likely never happen because porn is protected free speech and there have been cases ruled on by the supreme court allowing it to be online. however, since it is a community standard kind of thing that doesn't mean that there can't be individual cases where people are breaking the law and banned from selling porn online. Still, that is not a violation of their human rights.
With my question I wonder: If a person is afforded a fair trial, legal defense and a jury like any other crime and they are found guilty of copyright violation multiple times (at least three). Do you think it is fair that their access to the internet is taken away? If not, how many online crimes do they need to commit before they are denied access?