View Single Post
Old 06-06-2011, 08:34 PM  
pornlaw
Confirmed User
 
pornlaw's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 1,855
Quote:
Originally Posted by twistyneck View Post
No, you are wrong. This is a worker safety issue. Show me any other industry where someone can take a load of a possibly deadly chemical agent to the face and not be required to use safety equipment. Go to just about any other workplace in America and you'll see people using all kinds of safety gear. Condoms suck as far as porn is concerned but people should be able to work without risking their lives.
This workplace involves speech. Your example is not analogous. While I agree performers are entitled to be safe there are less restrictive means to achieve such without violating their or a producer's Constitutional rights. Some performers do not wish to be forced to use condoms.

It should be their choice.
__________________
Michael

www.AdultBizLaw.com
pornlaw is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote