Originally Posted by Jack Sparrow

Except that it does. And other traffic is counted perfectly fine. So this statement is mute.

Fact is, and choker already admitted this in this thread but is now carefully backpeddling his words after noticing how many serious biz people are reading along and are now questioning his biz ethics and selling tactics:

He buys remainder skim traffic from other brokers, filters them through his own network of questionable cj sites (fake thumbs etc), surfers are send through up to 10 of these questionable sites before landing on a buyers page. He is selling this as US_PREMIUM (although im sure he changed the text in his admib area now) for $4/k. He also stated to have no problem doing this as it was a "markets demand".

I already posted screens of his explanation of premium traffic from his own site a couple pages ago.

Furthermore, he is pretending i deliberatly bought the wrong traffic to bring his traffic in discredit. You would easily find dozens of posts, in public on gfy, where i give him a chance to manage the buy for this traffic test.

He declines it everytime, with obvious reasons. This traffic cant be managed at all, and he knows that too. He can only cling on to the facts that he didnt manage the buy, and that the site is bad or not working, or that google has a bug.

The site is loading fine. Its a custom handmade and engineer installed camsite from streamray. I actually added an additional landingpage (free cam preview) because he was complaining i shouldnt sent it to the indexpage. Now he is complaining about that landing page. He contradicts himself over and over again, because he says the other portion of his traffic is more than good enough. Ermm, hello?!? Its going to the exact same pages, from the same sources. So how do we explain that? Btw. he seems to boast about the "other" portion being good at 80% bouncerate. Hello? Premium at 80% bounce? I wonder how you call traffic compared from example oneclicktube.com (screenshots posted a couple pages ago). Superduperuberpremium? And how come the se sources and oneclicktube.com sources work perfectly fine with both the site and analytics? How does he come up with lame excuses about the pages nor loading 50% of the time?

Those arent facts, those are the excuses of a man busted epically.

I wasnt even going to post about THESE stats just now, untill he demanded proof of my statements. I provided him after warning him, in public on gfy, he and his 3-4 fake friends here did NOT want me to do this. Yet they insisted so here we are.

Everyone notices choker is dancing and twisting, slowly backpeddling his own words trying to put the blame on me.

He even attacks others that are now looking into their own stats from chokers traffic, and are seriously pissed off by what they discover. Its everyones fault but chokers own,

People are posting about being ripped off, call him a scammer. Im not agreeing with that. His ethics are just really really low. If he would be man enough about it instead of trying to bullshit his way out this thread would have been dying. Instead, he keeps fueling the fire with more bullshit, lies and contradictions that arent staffed with facts. None of them. He even states not selling to people now publicly posting about his traffic being crappy (or as some called it: fake). And they have NO problem posting screenshots of proof they did on fact buy his traffic. Denying people are his customers while they can prove they are in a couple of minutes, while he is trying to explain hos actions for over 24 hours now?! Kinda suspicious if you ask me.

If he was that honest, why all these excuses and contradictions. Is ot hard to keep up with all the bs lies choker?

And last but not he posted more then once that he was behind something that cost me 100k in income. He now avoids the question how or what, scared shitless. So thats good biz ethics to choker, trashing someones biz for 100k, admitting to this on public and them continously ignoring this question: what did you do that made me lose 100k in income choker? You owe us a big explanation about this statement buddy.

Untill he does answer that question i will continue to copypaste the exact text in this very post, because its simply enough unnecessary to explain things over and over again when all facts are so clear.

Good luck backpeddling out of this one choker, i guess this thread isnt working out exactly like you thought it would huh.