Quote:
Originally Posted by jimmy-3-way
I have never seen a Dean photo that has even come close to giving me wood or holding my interest, bottom line. I'm sure he's a nice guy, he's technically skilled and he probably makes a great living doing what he does.
In my personal and completely subjective opinion, to put it concisely: meh, well lit, naked broad.
|
No, you're right. Everyone is entitled to their opinion and has their own definition of sexy, so I shouldn't of written "I don't see how it's possible to have that opinion".
Personally, I prefer edgier type stuff. I don't know if you're from 3wayscash, but I think they do some really good work. Good use of lighting, shadows. The Roxana Milana elevator set is really freaking hot. It also seems that when the set as a whole isn't meant to be entirely kinky, there will usually be a subtle element of kinkiness somewhere.
Technically sound, but not too perfect. Raw. That's the type of stuff I personally prefer. From both a photography and 'drawing wood' standpoint.lol
With that being said, I still appreciate glamour photography and find it to be sexy. Especially Dean and Tammy Sands.