Quote:
Originally Posted by georgeyw
Pretty sure that's not the case.
Surely it would be more cost effective for Warner to just pay this guy a couple million rather than editing the entire movie?
|
No, I'm saying if they had just NOT directly copied the tattoo design when they shot the movie -- and opted for 99% duplicate. That could have legally kept them out of trouble. No viewer would get out a slide ruler while watching the movie and examine it.