Quote:
Originally Posted by kane
Here is what I really wonder: Why do you care what we think? Why are you here? About a year ago when the whole debacle with The Doc went down you explained how you would never accept The Docs offer because even if you were the one sending all the traffic because making a couple million per year was not enough to justify your efforts.
|
doc deal was publically available robbie and you guys could watch what i did and simply steal it without paying me a penny.
i could do the same thing any time spread it out amoung a hundred affiliate accounts make exactly the same money and keep it a secret and make both money i am making for selling the advice and the affiliate level commission doc was offering.
Quote:
|
You explained how you hold classes and each week you teach 10 different people how to use your techniques to monetize their content via torrents. For this you get $5,000 plus a royalty for life. By my calculations this means you should have made about $50K per week for the last year, assume you took a couple of weeks off that means you brought in about $2.5 million just in fees not counting the royalties. You should be rolling in cash.
|
i never said 10 per week
i never said week in week out
it bigger classes spread out
there is a lot of prep to get those rooms filled
and a good portion of the up front fees are spent on building the components necessary to make the nashian equilibriums to work.
that being said the 10% royalties are nice, and they are growing every year.
btw i am not the only person splitting the money for this.
Quote:
If I had a deal going that made me a couple of million per year the last thing I would be doing is getting on a webmaster board and trying to convince a bunch of sharks to look into the legitimacy of the technology and yet here you are.
|
because this arguements help me make better training
when i prove your arguement are bullshit (maybe they had better experts at the appeal) i can bypass the arguement completely by addressing the objections in advance
abraham lincoln did that when he was a practicing lawyer he argued both sides of the case in front of the jury, he just did a better job on his side.
your stupidity helps me identify the winning arguements.
and i don't have to worry about the arguement costing me a sale