Quote:
Originally Posted by gideongallery
doc deal was publically available robbie and you guys could watch what i did and simply steal it without paying me a penny.
i could do the same thing any time spread it out amoung a hundred affiliate accounts make exactly the same money and keep it a secret and make both money i am making for selling the advice and the affiliate level commission doc was offering.
|
Wrong. Whatever you and Doc were going to do would have been between the two of you. He may have posted results, but it would have only been numbers, not the technicalities of what was going on.
Quote:
i never said 10 per week
i never said week in week out
it bigger classes spread out
there is a lot of prep to get those rooms filled
and a good portion of the up front fees are spent on building the components necessary to make the nashian equilibriums to work.
that being said the 10% royalties are nice, and they are growing every year.
btw i am not the only person splitting the money for this.
|
You are right. I didn't remember it correctly so I went back and found it.
https://gfy.com/showpost.php?p=17330347&postcount=198 this is the original post from about 11 months ago where you claim you had just taught 30 different people and you went on to explain how you wanted to get classes as big as 1500 people so you can make bank for only working 1 week per month. How has that worked out? You are paranoid that Robbie and I would steal your formula if you worked with TheDoc, but you are willing to give that formula to 1500 people and hope that they can use it to make money which you will get a royalty on and hope they don't screw you out of.
But then recently you claimed you were the only one doing what you are doing and you are staying under the radar. You can't be both. You can't be under the radar and the lone wolf yet teaching 1500 people the techniques. So which is is? I think we know.
BTW if you had taken the deal and worked with TheDoc and you were able to do 100 sales per day right now you would be a multi-millionaire.
Quote:
because this arguements help me make better training
when i prove your arguement are bullshit (maybe they had better experts at the appeal) i can bypass the arguement completely by addressing the objections in advance
abraham lincoln did that when he was a practicing lawyer he argued both sides of the case in front of the jury, he just did a better job on his side.
your stupidity helps me identify the winning arguements.
|
Your problem is that you don't debate, you talk at. You never EVER accept that you might not be 100% correct in a situation. You often don't win debates with evidence, you simply wear other people out. That is annoying, it's not effective. You jump all over the place and if you can't win on one point you will go to another and another and another until eventually you forget what you were even debating about.
Here is a little tip. If you want to learn how to debate people you don't call them morons or idiots or racists. The second you start calling people names you start to lose credibility.