Quote:
Originally Posted by kane
Wrong. Whatever you and Doc were going to do would have been between the two of you. He may have posted results, but it would have only been numbers, not the technicalities of what was going on.
|
if i changed the content to make product placement for porn to be possible all you would need to do to copy it is look at the content
if i changed his tours so that they were piracy friendly all you would have to do do is look at the tour
the techniques could be copied from the changes so yes i would lose control
unfortunatly your cycle is close to tv shows which will be the real big money maker
Quote:
|
You are right. I didn't remember it correctly so I went back and found it. https://gfy.com/showpost.php?p=17330347&postcount=198 this is the original post from about 11 months ago where you claim you had just taught 30 different people and you went on to explain how you wanted to get classes as big as 1500 people so you can make bank for only working 1 week per month. How has that worked out? You are paranoid that Robbie and I would steal your formula if you worked with TheDoc, but you are willing to give that formula to 1500 people and hope that they can use it to make money which you will get a royalty on and hope they don't screw you out of.
|
1. the cycle for musicians is different then porn videos
2. i haven't gotton to the 1500 class level yet
3. when i do secrecy will be replaced with critical mass
i suggest you go back and read the thread because i already said that.
Quote:
|
But then recently you claimed you were the only one doing what you are doing and you are staying under the radar. You can't be both. You can't be under the radar and the lone wolf yet teaching 1500 people the techniques. So which is is? I think we know.
|
the one that works for mucisians may have similarities to the one that works for porn VIDEOS but it not exactly the same
i can teach the one that cycle for musicians
and keep the porn video cycle secret.
as long as you don't know exactly which musicians i a teaching you their hidden in the forrest of unsigned musicians.
Quote:
Your problem is that you don't debate, you talk at. You never EVER accept that you might not be 100% correct in a situation. You often don't win debates with evidence, you simply wear other people out. That is annoying, it's not effective. You jump all over the place and if you can't win on one point you will go to another and another and another until eventually you forget what you were even debating about.
Here is a little tip. If you want to learn how to debate people you don't call them morons or idiots or racists. The second you start calling people names you start to lose credibility.
|
seriously
your the guy who just argued that the appeals court ruled in favor of the exact same arguement that lost at the original trial because they had better experts at the appeal.
sorry but people so clueless about the way the law works that they would make those kinds of stupid statements are who i am arguing with.
moron is not name calling it an accurate title for those type of people.