Quote:
Originally Posted by gideongallery
if i changed the content to make product placement for porn to be possible all you would need to do to copy it is look at the content
if i changed his tours so that they were piracy friendly all you would have to do do is look at the tour
the techniques could be copied from the changes so yes i would lose control
unfortunatly your cycle is close to tv shows which will be the real big money maker
|
Again, nobody even needs to know what site you are promoting or how you are doing it. If we were to find it we would have to go searching for it and if it were really making 100+ sales per day I have a feeling TheDoc isn't going be posting the URL everywhere he goes.
The internet is a big place, there are plenty of places to hide and keep what you are doing to yourself.
Quote:
1. the cycle for musicians is different then porn videos
2. i haven't gotton to the 1500 class level yet
3. when i do secrecy will be replaced with critical mass
i suggest you go back and read the thread because i already said that.
|
the one that works for mucisians may have similarities to the one that works for porn VIDEOS but it not exactly the same
i can teach the one that cycle for musicians
and keep the porn video cycle secret.
as long as you don't know exactly which musicians i a teaching you their hidden in the forrest of unsigned musicians.[/QUOTE]
I did and it sounded a lot to me like you have a pipe dream that will likely never get off the ground.
Quote:
seriously
your the guy who just argued that the appeals court ruled in favor of the exact same arguement that lost at the original trial because they had better experts at the appeal.
sorry but people so clueless about the way the law works that they would make those kinds of stupid statements are who i am arguing with.
moron is not name calling it an accurate title for those type of people.
|
Clearly you don't understand what I am saying. My point was that every day in this country lawsuits are lost and the losers file an appeal. At the appeal they do something differently than they did at the original trial and they appeal goes in their favor. I don't know what they did differently, I just threw out a few different thoughts. Whatever it was, it worked.
But here is the problem with you. You will not cede a single point. In the Extreme Associates case you can't even accept that they won their initial court case only to then later lose the appeal.
By definition Win means: A successful result in a contest, conflict, bet, or other endeavor; a victory. So if you go into a court case seeking to have the case thrown out and that is the result you get, you have won. You were victorious. You can't even allow yourself to see that reality.
As for he name calling. You are the one who claims to be trying to change an entire industry. You are the one who says that you are here to learn how to overcome objections so you can learn from them and overcome them before they ever come up so that you can identify winning arguments,yet most of your points start off with MORON, IDIOT etc.
I'm not trying to tell you how to live your life. I don't care about you. I think you are nothing more than an egotistical, self-entitled pirate who likes to wrap themselves in the flag of fair use crusader or free speech advocate or whatever you are masquerading as this week. But in my life I have done plenty of business with people and I know if I were to have called them a moron because they didn't understand what I was saying they would have kicked my ass out the door.