Quote:
Originally Posted by kane
Again, nobody even needs to know what site you are promoting or how you are doing it. If we were to find it we would have to go searching for it and if it were really making 100+ sales per day I have a feeling TheDoc isn't going be posting the URL everywhere he goes.
The internet is a big place, there are plenty of places to hide and keep what you are doing to yourself.
|
you can't guarrentee that
it one single site, that a hell of a lot harder to hide then just spreading out the success amoung a hundred different accounts
he was giving me 50% only he wanted me to be the only affiliate that no better than a standard affiliate deal.
the docs offer didn't have any upside (it the same amount i could get thru 100 different accounts) and a huge downside risk.
it was only worth it if he did all the grunt work out his half (ie moved the people who would have submitted galleries to tgp to submitting tube videos)
then the amount of money would have been way more than a standard affiliate deal.
Quote:
Clearly you don't understand what I am saying. My point was that every day in this country lawsuits are lost and the losers file an appeal. At the appeal they do something differently than they did at the original trial and they appeal goes in their favor. I don't know what they did differently, I just threw out a few different thoughts. Whatever it was, it worked.
|
but the point is the REASON why they won defines the scope of the ruling
your using this "whatever" to argue that it had nothing to do with the distinction between public transmission and public broadcast.
to argue my scope definition is wrong because you say this "whatever" reason actually exists.
Quote:
But here is the problem with you. You will not cede a single point. In the Extreme Associates case you can't even accept that they won their initial court case only to then later lose the appeal.
By definition Win means: A successful result in a contest, conflict, bet, or other endeavor; a victory. So if you go into a court case seeking to have the case thrown out and that is the result you get, you have won. You were victorious. You can't even allow yourself to see that reality.
|
moron i never said they didn't win at the lower court level
i said they didn't win the CASE
it not weather they won it WHAT they won
your saying that a win on a motion to dismiss is equal to winning a case
in this case a win of the case would have double jeapordy protection so you could be tried at all for the crime again
a win on the motion to dismiss means that it can be appealed and the case can continue
There is a huge difference between those two wins
The fact is the supreme court never hears trials, there was absolutely no way shape or form they only hear appeals (using the strict rules for an appeal)
there is no possible way that extreme associates could ever ask the supreme court to hear their case. which means they never made such a request, which also means your reason for not hearing it is totally bogus as well.
the only issue to ajudicate was the motion to dismiss, the supreme court decision to not hear the case at all was strongest form of agreement that could ever be voiced with the appeal court ruling
if even 1 judge believed there was outstanding issues with the ruling, one judge believed that a single issue need to be clarified, the supreme court accepts the case
that the way it works.
Quote:
As for he name calling. You are the one who claims to be trying to change an entire industry. You are the one who says that you are here to learn how to overcome objections so you can learn from them and overcome them before they ever come up so that you can identify winning arguments,yet most of your points start off with MORON, IDIOT etc.
I'm not trying to tell you how to live your life. I don't care about you. I think you are nothing more than an egotistical, self-entitled pirate who likes to wrap themselves in the flag of fair use crusader or free speech advocate or whatever you are masquerading as this week. But in my life I have done plenty of business with people and I know if I were to have called them a moron because they didn't understand what I was saying they would have kicked my ass out the door.
|
it works doesn't how many times have you said you don't know why you argue with me
your doing the research for me.
your still trying to argue that win in a case is equal to win on a motion to dismiss
that arguement is like saying that a if you bet on a basketball game and your favorite team wins at football you should get paid just because they exist within the same city
the win on one battle does not automatically win the war.
and the difference between a motion to dismiss that can be overturned on appeal
and a win on the entire case, which has double jeapordy protection is and will aways be completely different.
even though both are "wins"