[QUOTE=gideongallery;18218225]
Quote:
it works doesn't how many times have you said you don't know why you argue with me
your doing the research for me.
your still trying to argue that win in a case is equal to win on a motion to dismiss
that arguement is like saying that a if you bet on a basketball game and your favorite team wins at football you should get paid just because they exist within the same city
the win on one battle does not automatically win the war.
and the difference between a motion to dismiss that can be overturned on appeal
and a win on the entire case, which has double jeapordy protection is and will aways be completely different.
even though both are "wins"
|
No, what I am saying is a win is a win is a win. If two teams are scheduled to play a game and one doesn't show up, the one that did show up wins. It isn't the same kind of win as if they had actually beaten them on the field, but they still get the win.
Whether the extreme associates won because the case was thrown out (their desired result) or whether it went to trail and they won via a jury ruling doesn't matter. A win is a win and no matter the outcome there was going to be an appeal.
Had they won via a jury ruling the appeal might have been harder to win, but it doesn't change the fact that the won the first round of the fight.
In the end does it really matter? You are so lost in the details of everything that I can't imagine how you actually enjoy life. When you bang a chick do you go through a 48 point checklist with her as foreplay?
Either way I'm done. Mid-year resolution will be to no longer bother you in your threads.