View Single Post
Old 06-28-2011, 10:54 PM  
SmokeyTheBear
►SouthOfHeaven
 
SmokeyTheBear's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: PlanetEarth MyBoardRank: GerbilMaster My-Penis-Size: extralarge MyWeapon: Computer
Posts: 28,609
Quote:
Originally Posted by theking View Post
You all to frequently use ludicrous analogies..
guilty as charged..
Quote:
Originally Posted by theking View Post
.and I prefer not to have intercourse with people that are clown's
wait wait.. i use ludicrous analogies and you are talking about having sex with clowns..??

you fucking sick clownophobic

Quote:
Originally Posted by theking View Post
I tend to doubt that you would be liable for the shit stain of a dog that I had criminally injured.
umm you just said , "the owner of the dog is legally liable for what ever damage their dog does...no matter the circumstance...period."

so which is it ?


Quote:
Originally Posted by theking View Post
the owner of the dog that killed the smaller dog...would be 100% iiable.
not sure if i trust your legal advice, you just stated 2 opposite legal advice above. One saying owner is always liable , one saying he isn't liable

besides i have never seen any law that uses the terminology " bigger dog / smaller dog "
__________________
hatisblack at yahoo.com
SmokeyTheBear is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote