Quote:
Originally Posted by TheDoc
Are you reading what I'm writing or only reading what you want to read?
And that lawyer is wrong... a "takedown notice" does not grant rights to private information that hasn't been legally signed over by the person or courts. It asks to remove content, which means if you sent it to the ISP, to comply they have to get the content removed or remove it directly.
As well, "take advantage" as the lawyer says, is a far cry from being "protected under it." Which again, swings both ways... such as, a non registered agent is not protected under DMCA, thus can be sued without notice.
|
When did you ever mention granting rights to private information? why do you keep bringing more shit into this?
Oh, the lawyer must be wrong?
A photographer's image is protected by DMCA whether they register a copyright or not. You clearly don't know wtf you're talking about here, and I'm done discussing it.