View Single Post
Old 06-30-2011, 12:02 PM  
Tom_PM
Porn Meister
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 16,443
The judge is making it tough on the defense regarding the upcoming rebuttal witnesses for the prosecution. The prosecution failed to get work records for Cindy Anthony to place her at work on the date she told them she was home searching for chloroform on google. Now they need to get those records because the defense simply asked her about it and she repeated what the state knew 2 yrs ago. It's kind of unfair to now allow the state to bring these records when they SHOULD have known it would be brought up at trial. It's a discovery violation but the judge said it's not. The defense has a matter of hours now to look over some 200 pages of work records and round up witnesses they may feel they need to place her at home rather than work on that date.

You could say that maybe the judge really believes that the state could not have anticipated the need for the records, therefore there's no violation. But that would also mean you think the prosecution is so incompetent that they didnt forsee the need to bring records on information crucial to what they said was a murder weapon! Appeal is absolutely certain I'd say at this time and on that point plus others.

Been busy here but I managed to catch that part while having lunch.
__________________
43-922-863 Shut up and play your guitar.
Tom_PM is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote