Originally Posted by ShellyCrash

I think I devoted a whole thread to how clueless the computer "experts" in this case seem to be. The first few days of testimony no one was even taking browser tabs into account.

Ultimately the history speaks for itself as far as the chloroform searches. Take the time stamps out of the equation, even put the mother in the house- the myspace and search activity is simultaneous. Casey and Cindy would have to be swapping seats in intervals as small as 20 seconds in succession. Sure, it's possible, but it's not practical. Especially when you consider keystroke time. It's crazy pills to try and reason it was anyone other than casey performing those searches.

But back to the time stamping, early on they spoke of comparing the system time to real gmt. They actually ran the forensics on the home desktop using two different types of software and even brought in and consulted the maker of one of the programs to figure out how far off the time stamps are, etc. They aren't just looking at the time stamp and taking it as gospel.

They also went into detail about the camera one of her exes used to take pics of caylee, how far off the time on the camera was to actual time, etc. And they did mention that with the camera, unlike the computer, someone could alter the time and date settings since the digital images in question were taken so they would not be able to put a certain time and date, only an estimate.