Quote:
Originally Posted by CDSmith
I read your initial comment on it, and agreed with it for the most part. But again I must say, the focus of this trial should be on answering the question: DID SHE DO IT? Anything else to me is just fluff and the defense trying everything they can to convolute the trial and dodge the real issue and confuse the public and the jury, period.
|
thas a good defense attorneys job....
all it takes is one..
I've watched the trial from start to finish and the state fucked it up...
Personally I think she will walk or involuntary manslaughter .... for sure it's nto first degree murder .. (well I think it is but the state has not proved beyond a reasonable doubt"
little school for the unknowing...
in criminal like this the burden is on the state to PROVE BEYOND A REASONABLE DOUBT.. the defense did pleanty to bring doubt into my mind.... I personally think the whole fucking family is in on it.....
in civil and in criminal probation revo cases and stuff like that you just have to prove "more likley than not"
2 tottally different things...
now once the state fucks this up she will walk and be free due to double jeopardy ...
all the better though.. in jail she'd have 24 hour security .. on the outside she's free to all angry mothers..... not a jury in the world would convict a mother killing casey.. I know I wouldn;t