Quote:
Originally Posted by sperbonzo
I'm not sure that any sexual event of ANY kind occurred. There does not seem to be any evidence of that at all. Anyone knowing his history as a hound, would see that this charge would be a believable one for the media.
The ONLY reason why the conspiracy theory even came to my mind was when I started looking at the order and timing of events up to today, the strangeness of his sudden resignation, and the backgrounds of the players involved regarding the new head of the IMF.
.
|
So, are you saying that the prosecutors are just lying in their claim that there's forensic evidence corroborating the fact that sex took place between the accuser and the accused?
Beyond that, his lawyer (Benjamin Brafman) said,
at a press conference held earlier this month: "When the evidence is in, it will be clear there was no forcible compulsion."
If no sex took place at all, why say "there was no forcible compulsion?" Wouldn't he just say the whole story was false?
No offense, but I think you might be a fact or two short on the developing narrative here, from either/both sides of the courtroom.
