Quote:
Originally Posted by Quentin
So, are you saying that the prosecutors are just lying in their claim that there's forensic evidence corroborating the fact that sex took place between the accuser and the accused?
Beyond that, his lawyer (Benjamin Brafman) said, at a press conference held earlier this month: "When the evidence is in, it will be clear there was no forcible compulsion."
If no sex took place at all, why say "there was no forcible compulsion?" Wouldn't he just say the whole story was false?
No offense, but I think you might be a fact or two short on the developing narrative here, from either/both sides of the courtroom.  |
I know what you're saying, but remember that if his defense lawyer is being told that there is evidence, then he has to act based on what he is being told by the D.A.s office. If they are telling Kahn to co-operate, or he is going down, then he would not be able to start yelling that this is a conspiracy against him, would he....
Again, I'm NOT a conspiracy nut, most of them are total crap, but the US government is capable of quite a bit, and it seems like they are getting more and more bold as time goes on.
.