Quote:
Originally Posted by beaner
The state is trying to get murder1 charge. So to do that they say internet searches was the premeditation, the duct tape was the murder weapon.
If you were trying to kill your daughter with a drug why then kill her with duct tape?
Doesn't it make more sense that she accidentally killed her (possibly by drug overdose) then stuck the heart sticker on her mouth and wrapped her in a bag and closed bag with duct tape?
She obviously killed her but what I, and many others, are saying is it was "likely" not a methodical planned out murder.
The outcome of such a murder is another murder by state.
|
To answer your first question the least painful, stressful way for the child to die would be to put her to sleep with some kind of drug or chloroform which has now been proven to have be searched 80 + times by the defendant and was present in the trunk of the car which has been proven in the eyes of the jury ( my assumption ) through testimony which also was shown to have contained the child's body.
Once the child is asleep the duct tape was placed over the mouth and nose which would effectively suffocate the child painlessly except for some involuntary body spasms of resistance. It would be a gentle way to kill some one much like one would put their pet to rest as opposed to blasting their head off with a shotgun starting from the feet and working your way up.
What I stated above its what the state is trying to prove.
You clearly say the she killed the child which is murder.
The state's case shows premeditation.
With all that you've heard in testimony, can you give another possible way she killed the child?