GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum - View Single Post - Question about everyone's extreme hatred towards .xxx

Barry-xlovecam · 07-04-2011, 07:21 AM

Of course, there is no need for .xxx However, few companies have 100's of brands (Jonson&Johnson?) Say what you mean — hundreds of SEO names with keywords ... If they contain Carlin's 7 words their revenues are at risk. Panda or some future search algorithm puts these sort of SEO names at risk too.

surprisingly;

Code:

Domain Name: CUNT.COM
   Registrar: GODADDY.COM, INC.
   Whois Server: whois.godaddy.com
   Referral URL: http://registrar.godaddy.com
   Name Server: NS1.ABOVE.COM
   Name Server: NS2.ABOVE.COM
   Status: clientDeleteProhibited
   Status: clientRenewProhibited
   Status: clientTransferProhibited
   Status: clientUpdateProhibited
   Updated Date: 02-jul-2011
   Creation Date: 09-feb-2001
   Expiration Date: 02-jul-2021

   Domain Name: TWAT.COM
   Registrar: NETWORK SOLUTIONS, LLC.
   Whois Server: whois.networksolutions.com
   Referral URL: http://www.networksolutions.com
   Name Server: TRAFFICDNS1.DDC.COM
   Name Server: TRAFFICDNS2.DDC.COM
   Name Server: TRAFFICDNS3.DDC.COM
   Name Server: TRAFFICDNS4.DDC.COM
   Status: clientTransferProhibited
   Updated Date: 11-apr-2011
   Creation Date: 07-dec-1995
   Expiration Date: 06-dec-2011

I suppose that these names might not be granted a trademark in the USA. However, I would think that paying the $100 a year to ICM in defensive registration would be a wise choice. Of course, if they had some legal angle and the money to sue ICM ...

Bottom line, this is a done deal unless someone is able to overturn it with some court order. Unifying the industry to just boycott .xxx and ICM is an option that will probably not work. Personally I have no intention of paying ICM anything. As I indicated before we will commence a WIPO action in any abusive registration of ACWebconnecting trademarked names.

07-04-2011, 07:21 AM
Barry-xlovecam It's 42 Industry Role: Join Date: Jun 2010 Location: Global Posts: 18,083	Of course, there is no need for .xxx However, few companies have 100's of brands (Jonson&Johnson?) Say what you mean — hundreds of SEO names with keywords ... If they contain Carlin's 7 words their revenues are at risk. Panda or some future search algorithm puts these sort of SEO names at risk too. surprisingly; Code: Domain Name: CUNT.COM Registrar: GODADDY.COM, INC. Whois Server: whois.godaddy.com Referral URL: http://registrar.godaddy.com Name Server: NS1.ABOVE.COM Name Server: NS2.ABOVE.COM Status: clientDeleteProhibited Status: clientRenewProhibited Status: clientTransferProhibited Status: clientUpdateProhibited Updated Date: 02-jul-2011 Creation Date: 09-feb-2001 Expiration Date: 02-jul-2021 Domain Name: TWAT.COM Registrar: NETWORK SOLUTIONS, LLC. Whois Server: whois.networksolutions.com Referral URL: http://www.networksolutions.com Name Server: TRAFFICDNS1.DDC.COM Name Server: TRAFFICDNS2.DDC.COM Name Server: TRAFFICDNS3.DDC.COM Name Server: TRAFFICDNS4.DDC.COM Status: clientTransferProhibited Updated Date: 11-apr-2011 Creation Date: 07-dec-1995 Expiration Date: 06-dec-2011 I suppose that these names might not be granted a trademark in the USA. However, I would think that paying the $100 a year to ICM in defensive registration would be a wise choice. Of course, if they had some legal angle and the money to sue ICM ... Bottom line, this is a done deal unless someone is able to overturn it with some court order. Unifying the industry to just boycott .xxx and ICM is an option that will probably not work. Personally I have no intention of paying ICM anything. As I indicated before we will commence a WIPO action in any abusive registration of ACWebconnecting trademarked names.