GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum - View Single Post - Hey dumb fucks, the jury found her not guilty so shut the fuck up

Tom_PM · 07-07-2011, 09:36 AM

The state has the MASSIVE advantage on evidence, they even get the last word with rebuttal and rebuttal closing arguments. They even leaked that there "was" a heart sticker RIGHT over the mouth on the duct tape. BUT they didnt leak that Cindy Anthony had said she thought she did the searches on the computer. Thats another HUGE advantage they had and used and still failed to prove their case. We KNOW from the trial there was no heart shaped sticker found. (and the residue disappeared?) Yet people still think for some reason that there was one! Why? People WANT to believe what they want to believe and so they do believe it.

People believe there was duct tape over her face. Why? Because duct tape was found near the skull? Was it even AROUND the skull? So should we believe Roy Kronk lifted the skull up and then set it back down and the tape never moved? And leading to that, should we think someone went to all the trouble to wrap the body in 3 bags and oh the heck with the head leave it out of the bags? I submit to you that the duct tape was sealing the bag, and Kronk removed it, and the head fell out when he lifted the bag, and the head landing on the duct tape. Whats more likely. But I admit I missed the part of the trial where they asked him if the tape was on the skull or not. And clearly I havent seen pictures. A lot of it still doesn't make sense. The prosecution says the water was deep and flowing enough to leave only silt in the skull, but that the hair was over the tape proves the tape was on before she decomposed? Water doesn't move hair? Just a mess.

Also for what it's worth, the word is that the initial jury vote when they began deliberations was 10 to 2. Only 2 people thought she was guilty initially and then came around to not guilty.

07-07-2011, 09:36 AM
Tom_PM Porn Meister Industry Role: Join Date: Feb 2005 Posts: 16,443	The state has the MASSIVE advantage on evidence, they even get the last word with rebuttal and rebuttal closing arguments. They even leaked that there "was" a heart sticker RIGHT over the mouth on the duct tape. BUT they didnt leak that Cindy Anthony had said she thought she did the searches on the computer. Thats another HUGE advantage they had and used and still failed to prove their case. We KNOW from the trial there was no heart shaped sticker found. (and the residue disappeared?) Yet people still think for some reason that there was one! Why? People WANT to believe what they want to believe and so they do believe it. People believe there was duct tape over her face. Why? Because duct tape was found near the skull? Was it even AROUND the skull? So should we believe Roy Kronk lifted the skull up and then set it back down and the tape never moved? And leading to that, should we think someone went to all the trouble to wrap the body in 3 bags and oh the heck with the head leave it out of the bags? I submit to you that the duct tape was sealing the bag, and Kronk removed it, and the head fell out when he lifted the bag, and the head landing on the duct tape. Whats more likely. But I admit I missed the part of the trial where they asked him if the tape was on the skull or not. And clearly I havent seen pictures. A lot of it still doesn't make sense. The prosecution says the water was deep and flowing enough to leave only silt in the skull, but that the hair was over the tape proves the tape was on before she decomposed? Water doesn't move hair? Just a mess. Also for what it's worth, the word is that the initial jury vote when they began deliberations was 10 to 2. Only 2 people thought she was guilty initially and then came around to not guilty. __________________ 43-922-863 Shut up and play your guitar.