Originally Posted by TylerBang

Just came across some court documents, thought I would share this info.

Epass was being sued (no surprise) in Sept. 2010 for another issue in which they were attempting not to pay an affiliate his funds.
Basically it goes like this.

1.The attorney for Plaintiff issues a deposition Subpoena to Epassporte.
Gregory Elias responds by saying "sorry, epassporte is a Curacao co. and doesn't respond to u.s. subpoenas, try a curacao court."

2. The attorney for Plaintiff issues demand for documents to same with same response.

3. The attorney for Plaintiff issues same to Joseph Mccann (mallicks u.s. atty) for 24-7 commerical mktg, Mccann responds that they can't because those belong to epassporte and any documentation that 24-7 CM has is subject to confidentiality ...etc.. you must ask Epassporte.

4. The attorney for Plaintiff issues supoena for Epass employees, Joseph Mccann (mallicks atty) now responds (surprise) that he is the atty for Epass AND 24-7cm, but that Epass has No U.S. employee's and only has ONE EMPLOYEE. Who is Epass' only employee?

Gregory Elias.

A one man company. He must have been so busy.

Based on the documentation, this one had been going on for over a year, and for not much money. The plaintiff just stuck with it because he didn't want to let Mallick rip him off.