Quote:
Originally Posted by Redrob
Property rights cannot be substituted with use rights as the rights belong to two different sets of users, i.e. content producers and users.
|
exactly my point that why comparing copyright infringement to stealing shoes is total bs
the former is a situation where property rights can never be transfered, the latter is
that the huge difference that completely invalidates the arguement
copyright is a transfer of right of use for everything except fair use, which there is no need of tranfer because copyright act explictly says the copyright holder holds no exclusive rights for.
Quote:
|
Time shifting for private use is permitted, mass distribution in the name of time shifting is not permitted.
|
what to show me where in the definition it ever says private only fair use
Quote:
Section 107 also sets out four factors to be considered in determining whether or not a particular use is fair:
The purpose and character of the use, including whether such use is of commercial nature or is for nonprofit educational purposes
The nature of the copyrighted work
The amount and substantiality of the portion used in relation to the copyrighted work as a whole
The effect of the use upon the potential market for, or value of, the copyrighted work
|
it doesn't exist
if it did caching would be illegal because it very public
and the internet as a whole would be destroyed
Quote:
Fucking pirates trying to redefine the arguments. They should be prosecuted and put in jail.
I'm surprised that nobody has brought a RICO suit against one of these fucking tubesites.
|
yeah th e horror expecting you to obey the law as it written rather then letting you getting away with making up this private vs public bullshit as a way to invalidate LEGIT fair use.
how dare anyone redefine the arguement back to the TRUTH.