Quote:
Originally Posted by gideongallery
exactly my point that why comparing copyright infringement to stealing shoes is total bs
the former is a situation where property rights can never be transfered, the latter is
that the huge difference that completely invalidates the arguement
copyright is a transfer of right of use for everything except fair use, which there is no need of tranfer because copyright act explictly says the copyright holder holds no exclusive rights for.
what to show me where in the definition it ever says private only fair use
it doesn't exist
if it did caching would be illegal because it very public
and the internet as a whole would be destroyed
yeah th e horror expecting you to obey the law as it written rather then letting you getting away with making up this private vs public bullshit as a way to invalidate LEGIT fair use.
how dare anyone redefine the arguement back to the TRUTH.
|
I don't know if you realize this about yourself, but you have a way of double-talking -- almost in some kind of half-baked legalese, and twisting things to fit your view of the way YOU think things should be. What you say barely makes sense, and only makes it obvious to everyone that you have never created anything. You just want to make money from other people's work, and make up silly, overly technical excuses to justify the living you make from it.
http://www.nolo.com/legal-encycloped...ial-30100.html
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fair_use
(read the section on Amount and Sustainability)
You seem to be the self-proclaimed expert on fair use, but it also looks like you make up your own definition of it.