Quote:
Originally Posted by bronco67
I don't know if you realize this about yourself, but you have a way of double-talking -- almost in some kind of half-baked legalese, and twisting things to fit your view of the way YOU think things should be. What you say barely makes sense, and only makes it obvious to everyone that you have never created anything. You just want to make money from other people's work, and make up silly, overly technical excuses to justify the living you make from it.
http://www.nolo.com/legal-encycloped...ial-30100.html
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fair_use
(read the section on Amount and Sustainability)
You seem to be the self-proclaimed expert on fair use, but it also looks like you make up your own definition of it. |
you might want to read your own quoted sources and the section you pointed me too
Quote:
|
Yet see Sony Corp. v. Universal City Studios for a case in which substantial copying?entire programs for private viewing?was upheld as fair use, at least when the copying is done for the purposes of time-shifting.
|
when i use the torrents to copy a tv show, i may be copying it from a public swarm (cloud), it however is still a copy made for a private viewing.
the cable vision case clearly established that public transmission of data does not invalidate the timeshifting right to make a copy.