Quote:
Originally Posted by Sausage
Then you need a different conservative party.
The role of a liberal (left) government is to expand welfare, spend more, and increase governmnent. This isn't always a bad thing.
The role of a conservative (right) government is to decrease the size of government, reduce spending, reduce welfare.
Ideally both should balance eachother out though if any gets total control then you are in trouble. If both sides are increasing government then you are in for a disaster .. look at Greece ... they are suffering from a liberal agenda hangover.
|
In theory you are correct, but that just isn't how it works. The conservatives have been packaging and repackaging the same campaign promises for 30+ years and they never follow through with them. Ever since Reagan the conservatives have promised to lower spending, reduce the size of government, reduce the role of government in our day to day lives (saying that less government is better government), spend money more wisely and in doing all of this they will need less money so they will be able to lower taxes.
The reality is that every single one of them has grown the size of the government. Every single one of them has increased spending. Not one of them has reduced the amount of government in our lives and they all spend money like a drunken Kennedy in a strip club. They have lowered taxes, but as we see when you do that without curbing spending it doesn't really work out so well.
The only thing truly conservative thing about them is some of their social beliefs and as we find out about a lot of them they don't really even believe that, they just say it because it is the party line and helps them get elected. Those social beliefs allow them to repackage the same shit and still get votes because there are people out there that will vote for any candidate so long as they are pro-life or anti-porn or project themselves as a social conservative. So every election they just repackage the message and hit the road and somehow it continues to work.
The liberals have been no better not only have they failed to implement most of their ideas, but most of them are spineless and won't stand up for themselves. When Bush and the republicans had control of the house, senate and white house they did what they wanted. The democrats threatened filibusterer, but the republicans called their bluff and went right along on their agenda.When the tables turned and the democrats controlled all three houses more often than not they gave into the republicans not because they had a better idea, but because they didn't want a confrontation and risk losing. the republicans had one agenda for the first 2 years of Obama's presidency. The agenda was simply, "If he and the democrats are for it, we are against it." It is a bold move because had the democrats actually passed legislation that was good it would have made the republicans look terrible, but the democrats wimped out on a lot of things and basically handed power back to the republicans.
The democrats had the republican party on the ropes. After the 2008 election the party was in shambles and was rife with infighting. They had no power and for a while it looked like the only leader they had was Mr. Oxycontin himself Rush Limbaugh. But the democrats refused to move in for the knockout blow.
So we have flat out liars on one side and spineless fools on the other. Not a good combination for success.