Quote:
Originally Posted by gideongallery
unlike a chair where i have all those rights automatically
the reason i need to get permission is because copyright takes away those automatic rights
and replaces them with licienced rights.
The only reason that taking away of rights is not a violation of my human right is because for the scope of fair use those normal property rights exist.
for the scope of commentary i am allowed to distribute other peoples content (ask micheal moore)
and i can do it even if the copyright holder doesn't want me to do it.
|
Odd, if it was automatic then ownership would be implied, but it's not.. I can set terms of ownership and your agreement, ANY, way I wish, period - that's MY right and YOUR right to refuse or accept it.
Ownership is NOT automatic, the right to own property, does NOT grant your permission to do shit with it - your right is to own it, PERIOD!
And courts all over the world disagree with you, oh and MM gave permission...