Quote:
Originally Posted by gideongallery
wow a pro intellectual property says that court definition isn't right
http://ipwatchdog.com/2010/03/06/deb...opoly/id=9538/
considering that one of the questions asked was
by definition copyright allows you to raise the price from market defined price of free to something greater than free.
The fact that digital goods gravitate to free may be a justification for having the monopoly
but it most certainly does not allow you ignore the fact that you are in fact charging a price higher than what open competition would cause the price to be (free). |
DUDE LMAO
OPEN COMPETITION? torrents don't produce anything, their users putting copyrighted material don't produce it and are not licensed to put it up there for free to all to download. WHAT COMPETITION? FIRST PRODUCE SOMETHING IN DEMAND, DISTRIBUTE IT FOR FREE, SOMEHOW MAGICALLY MAKE MILLIONS OF DOLLARS then you can talk about OPEN COMPETITION and how anyone can make money producing IP for free.
YOU failed to answer that question but reserved it to twist it for you later argument. get the fuck outta here