Quote:
Originally Posted by TheDoc
That article is about Patents, it doesn't say the word Copyright anywhere in the article.
Killer Fail though  |
seriously you don't even recognize the sources for your own quotes
Quote:
Originally Posted by TheDoc
gideongallery.... the shit just keeps spewing from you.
The United States Supreme Court frequently refers to a patent as providing a "limited monopoly." This is not, however, appropriate usage of the term monopoly in the economic sense. In fact, intellectual property protection cannot properly be thought of as providing an economic monopoly, at least in part, because a monopoly can only exist in the presence of a market and the ability of an actor to manipulate the market to a point where higher than competitive prices are able to be maintained, which is something that is rarely achievable by an owner of intellectual property.
Source: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Intelle...poly_privilege |
go back to the wiki article
click on the footnote link for the quote you were trying to use to justify arguing that the supreme court was wrong.
see where it leads you too.