Quote:
Originally Posted by gideongallery
seriously you don't even recognize the sources for your own quotes
go back to the wiki article
click on the footnote link for the quote you were trying to use to justify arguing that the supreme court was wrong.
see where it leads you too.
|
Soooo... you you call my source wrong then use a source from mine to make your argument? Brilliant.....
Even though we aren't talking about patents, which may never be a monopoly, I'll go with it anyway.
Here, your article says: "
Just because an inventor has been granted a patent does not mean that there will be a market for the patent product, and without a market there can be no monopoly."
And part of my quote said: "
a monopoly can only exist in the presence of a market and the ability of an actor to manipulate the market"
Looks like it was correct after all... looks like the courts did agree with the wiki article I shared. And you're still using the term incorrectly.