Quote:
Originally Posted by TheDoc
Hahahaha.... AGAIN, your source said THE EXACT SAME THING - Almost word for word - yet mine is wrong.. 
I really don't care about your other dribble. |
1. there was no source just a counter arguement
2. it said the exact opposite
Quote:
"Just because an inventor has been granted a patent does not mean that there will be a market for the patent product, and without a market there can be no monopoly."
|
yet i pointed out that Acacia made millions from their worthless patent
none of the people who licience thought it was valid
they paid the money because it cost too much money to fight
that a real world example that proves you don't need a market for monopoly pricing to occur
a worthless patent with no market whatsoever was licienced to people for millions