Quote:
Originally Posted by TheDoc
Here's what you don't seem to understand.... idiot.
The only person talking this topic twist, is you... first because you've twisted it so far off what was actually being talked about, it's just pathetic. Then secondly, because this actual topic you're discussing right now, is exactly what I said, what was quoted/shared and you're refuting with... exactly what was said anyway.
Dude... I don't know of you smoke pot, crack, or maybe you drink. But I suggest you clean up, your brain is in backwards.
|
i quoted a
copyright case (betamax case ) to point out they supreme court declared
copyright to be a monopoly 20 times.
you quoted from wikipedia about
patents to argue that my
copyright is a monopoly statement.
you were the one who moved off copyright to patent.
I just proved that it was totally wrong two ways
1. by proving that no infringement could occur in a no market situation
2. proving that even when no one wants or even believes that the patent is valid people will licience it to avoid the court cost
if you want to parallel that back to copyright it not that hard
ask all the people who simply paid the settlement cost even though they didn't download anything just because it cost more to fight then to settle.
ie the dead guy who was sent a demand letter because his ip address downloaded copyright material after he was dead. (open wifi in dead guys apartment)