Quote:
Originally Posted by TheDoc
Actually... my reply was based on OUR conversion, my first reply to you in this thread pointed out that you "twist a meaning to your own benefit" - which you also talked about monopolies in.
And just like my reply back with the wiki, with the point to show you're spewing more bullshit, to twist the bullshit to your own meanings. Which.... you then proceeded to argue with the same thing it says. After that point it's just your dumb ass trying to twist in new shit to prove some point nobody gives a shit about.
That's the off topic, stupid twist, you took... that's what I pointed out in my first reply, other replies, and above.
Damn you're thick.
|
so producing a concrete example that explictly proves your wiki reference is wrong is BS
lol
you do realize that a circular proof right
your arguement is bs because i disagree with it
i present an arguement
you present a concrete example that proves my arguement false
but because you are disagreeing with my completely false arguement your proof is bs.