Quote:
Originally Posted by baddog
The duct tape had DNA on it. The DNA ruled out Casey and Kaylee as the source. So, what evidence are you looking at?
|
It should also be noted the FBI crime lab admitted they accidentally contaminated the tape when a member of their team handled it w/o gloves.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Deej
Casey's Dad?
seriously?
Do elaborate because I havent heard this angle.
|
The DA dropped the ball by not painting a timeline of events for the date the child died ruling out George Anthony as a player when they presented their case and instead trying to sit on it for rebuttal.
Their plan was to let the defense put forth the details of the drowning in the defense's case and then blow the timeline apart in rebuttal.
Casey's cell phone records, George's cell phone records, as well as activity logs from the anthony's home confirm after George Anthony left for work on the 16th Casey returned to the house where she stayed until after 4pm.
The jury never heard it because outside of opening statements the defense never tried to present a theory or timeline of events. They never asked George Anthony if he found the child in the pool, they never asked him if he told Casey to hide the body or that they should try and cover it up rather than call 911. They just made innuendos and let the jury connect the dots in their own minds.
What I don't understand is why some people are more willing to connect the dots with the defense's theory when forming their personal opinion than the prosecution's when the prosecution had much more evidence to support it. I mean, what's the evidence that George was involved and the child drowned?
