Originally Posted by gideongallery

did you even read your own statement
he agreed with you when you put the condition of an actual sale happening

your interpretation of what he was saying contridicts your conversation with him

he is objecting to free alternatives being taken down, from having the choice to try before he buys taken away from him

btw his arguement is even more anti copyright than mine
i believe i should have a right to use the torrents as a radio station BECAUSE canada has a piracy tax which provides greater compensation then the liciencing fees paid for radio broadcast.(on a per person basis)







this is where you cross the line he is complaining about

your arguing that they have a right to sell it forever, fine you can do that cc-sa

but then you demand that they can only do it if they GET PERMISSION

like i said your arguement justifies selling your shit over and over again

your trying to use it to justify taking that right away from other people.

if i bought a car i could sell to someone else, i could rent it out, i could even provide a service for a fee (taxi cab/limo service) all without every getting PERMISSION from the car manufacturer.




but as i pointed out your trying to make too points

1. that they should have a right to keep selling their stuff
2. the right to prevent people who don't have PERMISSION from doing what they want with it

I have no problem with the first

if every artist was forced to release their stuff under CC-SA you would still have that right.

however nothing you said justifies the second arguement.