Quote:
Originally Posted by dyna mo
typical ron paul attitude, make it about the messenger or anything other than the actual facts that are presented.
|
So you're choosing to ignore the FACT that he clearly states there is no need to default in the op-ed piece?
You know, the fact which you yourself presented in a link?
Sadly, it appears that you are. If you will go so far as to blatantly ignore such an obvious fact, then it's impossible to have an intelligent discussion with you. Can't say it surprises me though, as you seem to resort to name calling and rambling on a frequent basis:
Quote:
"hahahah....ron paul disciples...conspiracy theorists....bullshit...ron paulies....i couldn't care less...piece of shit politician...hahahahahahahahah......hahahahahahaha ....you ron paulies"
|
It's clear you've got a bee in your bonnet over Ron Paul. While far from being a "disciple," I and a number of other webmasters on this forum happen to agree with a lot of things he has to say. He's looking like the best choice for me in 2012 so far, but I'm always open to alternatives.
That's why I asked you earlier in this thread who you are interested in:
https://gfy.com/showpost.php?p=18316122&postcount=12
Quote:
Originally Posted by acrylix
dyna mo, it seems you are not a fan of Ron Paul.
Is there someone else running for president in 2012 who you prefer?
|
Maybe you missed it, cause I never got an answer.