Quote:
Originally Posted by acrylix
So you're choosing to ignore the FACT that he clearly states there is no need to default in the op-ed piece?
You know, the fact which you yourself presented in a link?
Sadly, it appears that you are. If you will go so far as to blatantly ignore such an obvious fact, then it's impossible to have an intelligent discussion with you. Can't say it surprises me though, as you seem to resort to name calling and rambling on a frequent basis:
It's clear you've got a bee in your bonnet over Ron Paul. While far from being a "disciple," I and a number of other webmasters on this forum happen to agree with a lot of things he has to say. He's looking like the best choice for me in 2012 so far, but I'm always open to alternatives.
That's why I asked you earlier in this thread who you are interested in: https://gfy.com/showpost.php?p=18316122&postcount=12
Maybe you missed it, cause I never got an answer. |
look, just like it is ok and inconsequential that ron paulies can post ron paul videos around here espousing the wonder of ron paul, i can post my view and corresponding youtube videos showing what a retarded, obstructionist, hypocritical career politician he is.
and as for who i back for prez 2012, i didn't reply because i could not give 2 shits which side of the same coin is in charge of the white house- absolutely ZERO will change.