So back again and still think I could of framed it better. Could just be tighter by a bit. Still not as loose as some.
By the end I was shaking and close to collapsing. So got some camera shake. Couldn't stop as it would of harmed Sandra's flow.
Could of been harder for Mofos, they seem to like dirty great big dildos shoved in every orifice. I'm sure I could of found one here, but would she speak English, did I know her and was she any good? Rock and hard place.
The climax at the end should of been with the massage and a dildo, sorry. Slipped up there, as just trying to stay stood up.
The biggest problem IMO is the lack of an intro and exit. The intro set Sandra up and was only a few seconds, the exit clearly displayed what a good time she had.
I did shoot it.
Good points.
I kept as much of Sandra in the wide frame as possible, kept her laying or on all 4s. So many shoot scenes that are just scenarios of the location, it's easy to see why some need to stick roses in the background. </sarcasm>
The rapport between me and Sandra is good, she's having fun teasing me and this is carried across to all the viewers. Yes she's a little bit over the top for me with the porn star talk, but that's what I wanted. Eastern European, loves sex and shares it. She smiles a lot which is nice.
As I zoom in for close ups I still keep her face in the frame, so it's not a scene mostly about her pussy or gynecological. She's showing her enjoyment to me. Hard to do that with a room full of people.
Also Sandra's starting to sweat, the pleasure is hotting her up.
The orgasms at the end are real and Sandra shares them.
Sorry I didn't get a florist in, or a lighting guy, sound technician, make up artist, or rent a suite with a better sofa. Not sure if anyone jerks off to any of those things.
Yes Sandra's no Spring Chicken. However being out of it for 3 years I needed a girl I knew could do it right. Looks good, speaks English, would let go and share it and take directions. Not time to be trying out a new model.
Sandra's performance is far more real than a lot of porn valley models. For a girl whose second language is English, her porn speak vocabulary is far better than many. She delivers her lines with some feeling, because I don't give girls lines. They're not actors and giving them lines makes the whole performance even more fake. They seem to like me enough to be able to share their feelings. Which I capture in the lens.
Her faked orgasms are convincing, her real ones very much so.
After a 3 year layoff, physical condition and being primarily a stills shooter for the last 14 years a good job. If I came back fully fit the few points I missed out on I would get right. They're technical and easy to fix.
Is it better than some SAF content? In my opinion yes. Porn Valley girls have a way of delivering a scene that's just plastic. No matter how good the lighting, sound, rose in the back ground or expensive the sofa is. The girl is often just going through the motions.
It's far superior to the golf club scene in the garden and the follow up scene on the sofa. And a lot of other scenes. Getting all the technical stuff right isn't hard. Getting a model whose working for money to deliver a really good scene is.
As for framing, well some shooters would be better off if they dropped wide screen format, they shoot porn locations more than porn scenes. We see the whole couch and it's L shape and would seat 6 people, the models fucking are reduced to 1/4 or less of the screen, people frame the guy standing head to toe. Pounding away on a girl whose thinking about what to cook for dinner. Then a faked orgasm or 2 and a climax that's just the same old thing seen a 1,000 times before.
Forget to turn off the air conditioner, with the over head mike positioned over a machine whirring.
Or shooting in a location, which seemed to be at the end of a runway.
Is it better than the $500 scenes I see everywhere? Yes bloody sight better.