A few years back the US Supreme Court issued a ruling that had some interesting language. Next stop: decriminalizing/legalizing polygamy?
http://opinion.latimes.com/opinionla...-polygamy.html
Quote:
[Justice Anthony M.] Kennedy emphasized in Lawrence that same-sex marriage wasn't before the court. Similarly, in an interview with the New York Times, Turley suggested that decriminalizing polygamy will not inevitably lead to a movement for polygamous marriage. But language addressed to one issue often surfaces in cases dealing with others. When Massachusetts' highest court decided to strike down the state's limitation of marriage to heterosexual couples, it cited the Lawrence opinion.
[?]
But, like Lawrence, a ruling sympathetic to unconventional sexual behavior could plant the seeds of a future campaign for full marriage equality. In that case, governments would have to prove that it's rational to limit marriage to two individuals, homosexual or heterosexual. That might seem obvious, but so, at one time, did the argument that marriage should be confined to opposite-sex couples.
|
Does the issue boil down to this: Is polygamy a VOLUNTARY CHOICE whereas SEXUAL ORIENTATION isnt?