Quote:
Originally Posted by gideongallery
actually the misconduct was the action of how they sued people and threated to sue people
Using his position to take unfair advantage of others. = sending threatening letters to potentially innocent people
Giving false statements to the court = misrepresenting the validity of the evidence (hiding false positives)
|
Aye, but it doesn't say the action of mass suing was the issue.... but rather his direct conduct, related to the threatening of innocent people without evidence to support the action, is the issue.
Meaning, if they had real proof and mass sued, it wouldn't be an issue.